The History of Film Censorship in the UK
Film censorship in the UK has a long and often contentious history, reflecting societal values and concerns about morality, public safety, and artistic expression. From the earliest days of cinema to the present, the struggle between creative freedom and regulation has shaped the landscape of British film.
Early Days: The 1900s and the Birth of Censorship
Censorship in the UK can be traced back to the early 1900s when films began to gain popularity. The first significant censorship legislation was the Cinematograph Act of 1909, which established a framework for local authorities to license films. This Act allowed councils to screen films but also granted them the power to ban films they deemed inappropriate. The first notable example of this came in 1916 when the film The Better 'Ole, a satirical take on World War I, was banned in several councils for its perceived disrespect towards the armed forces.
The 1910s also saw the introduction of various local censorship boards, which often resulted in films being cut or banned based on community standards. The 1914 film The Last Days of Pompeii faced significant cuts for its depiction of violence and immorality, showing how even historical narratives were not exempt from censorship's reach.
The 1920s: The Rise of the British Board of Film Censors
As the film industry grew, so did the need for a more unified approach to censorship. In 1917, the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) was established, which later became the British Board of Film Classification. The BBFC was tasked with reviewing films and assigning age classifications. This marked a significant shift in censorship, as films were now subjected to a central authority rather than the whims of local councils.
In the 1920s, films like The Kiss (1920) faced intense scrutiny due to their suggestive content. The BBFC took a more conservative approach, banning the film outright until cuts were made to soften its risqué nature. The 1927 film The Black Diamond was another example, facing bans for its portrayal of drug use and moral decay.
This era also saw the introduction of the "A" certificate, allowing films to be viewed by audiences aged 14 and over, paving the way for more diverse content. However, this also meant that films featuring violence or sexual themes were still often cut or heavily scrutinised.
The 1930s: The Hays Code Influence
The 1930s were heavily influenced by the American Hays Code, which imposed strict guidelines on film content to avoid censorship. Although the Hays Code was not officially adopted in the UK, its principles seeped into British cinema. Films that tackled taboo subjects—like sex, violence, and drug use—faced significant cuts. A prime example is The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934), directed by Alfred Hitchcock, which underwent several revisions to align with the prevailing moral standards of the time. Hitchcock had to remove several scenes that were deemed too intense, reflecting the era's conservative sensibilities.
Another notable case was the film The Informer (1935), which portrayed themes of betrayal and violence. The BBFC initially banned it but eventually allowed it after significant cuts, showcasing the tension between artistic intent and public morality.
World War II: Censorship Tightens
During World War II, film censorship intensified as the government sought to control the narrative around the war. The BBFC became more vigilant in screening films, ensuring they aligned with patriotic sentiments. Films like This Happy Breed (1944), which explored the lives of a working-class family during the war, faced scrutiny to ensure they conveyed an appropriate message of resilience and national unity.
In 1941, the film That Hamilton Woman, which starred Vivien Leigh and Laurence Olivier, was released. The film was initially controversial due to its portrayal of the British aristocracy and its somewhat sympathetic view of Napoleon. It underwent numerous cuts before release, as officials feared it could undermine morale during the war.
The 1960s: A Cultural Revolution
The 1960s marked a turning point in British cinema, reflecting broader social changes and a shift towards liberalization. The 1966 film Blow-Up, directed by Michelangelo Antonioni, challenged traditional notions of censorship with its frank portrayal of sexuality. It was one of the first films to receive an "AA" certificate, allowing viewers aged 14 and over to see it.
This era also saw the gradual relaxation of censorship, with films like The Graduate (1967) pushing boundaries. The BBFC granted an "A" rating, allowing younger audiences to view the film despite its exploration of adult themes, including an affair between a young man and an older woman. The controversy surrounding The Fox (1967), based on the novel by D.H. Lawrence, showcased the changing attitudes toward sexuality, with the BBFC initially banning the film before allowing it to be released with cuts.
The 1980s: Video Nasties and the Panic
The 1980s ushered in a new wave of censorship concerns, particularly with the rise of home video. The term "video nasty" emerged, referring to a collection of films that were considered excessively violent or obscene. The 1984 Video Recordings Act was introduced to regulate the video market, leading to the banning of numerous titles like The Evil Dead and Cannibal Holocaust.
This period was marked by public outcry and moral panic, driven by sensationalist media coverage that portrayed these films as corrupting influences on society. The BBFC's decision to classify and, in some cases, ban these films sparked fierce debates about freedom of expression. In a particularly notorious case, the film Driller Killer (1979) was released uncut in the UK, leading to protests and discussions about the implications of graphic violence in cinema.
The 21st Century: A New Era of Regulation
As we entered the 21st century, the landscape of film censorship in the UK continued to evolve. The BBFC adapted to the digital age, implementing new classification systems and engaging with audiences through online platforms. Notable films like Nymphomaniac (2013) and The Human Centipede 2 (2011) faced scrutiny, but the BBFC ultimately adopted a more nuanced approach, recognising the importance of context in assessing content.
In recent years, the BBFC has also revisited older films to reflect changing attitudes towards swearing, sex, and violence. For example, The Shining (1980) was originally classified as an "AA" film upon its release, but in 2018, it was reclassified as "15" to acknowledge contemporary views on horror and psychological thrillers. Similarly, The Evil Dead (1981) was initially banned as a video nasty but was later granted an "18" certificate, allowing it to be screened uncut, reflecting a shift in societal acceptance of graphic content when viewed within the context of genre filmmaking.
The classification of films like Fifty Shades of Grey (2015) showcased this balance, with the BBFC allowing the film to be released with an "18" rating after a thorough examination of its content.
The emergence of streaming platforms has also posed new challenges for film censorship. With films and series being accessible worldwide, the UK has had to grapple with how to regulate content that may not adhere to local standards, leading to ongoing discussions about the future of censorship in the digital age.
Conclusion: A Constant Tug-of-War
The history of film censorship in the UK reflects a constant tug-of-war between societal values and artistic expression. As we look back on the past, it's clear that censorship is not merely about banning content but about navigating the complex relationship between culture, morality, and creativity. While the landscape has shifted dramatically over the years, the conversation around censorship continues to evolve, ensuring that the debate remains as relevant today as it was a century ago.
In a world where films serve as both a reflection of society and a catalyst for change, the story of censorship in the UK highlights the importance of balancing creative freedom with the responsibility of filmmakers and audiences alike. As cinema continues to evolve, so too will the conversations around what should be allowed on screen, challenging us to consider how we define and defend artistic expression in an ever-changing world.
Find out about submitting to Boundless Film Festival here.